Skip to main content

Maximize your chances for success with good communication skills

Maximize your chances for success with good communication skills
By Steven A. Watson <http://ups.asia.cnet.com/c/as.ql.feedbackstory/asia.cnet.com/itmanager/project/feedback.htm?ids=39161912>, TechRepublic <http://www.techrepublic.com>
Tuesday, December 30 2003 11:30 AM

Successful IT managers learn early in their careers that perception is just as important as reality in the work environment. It's not good enough to be the best at what you do—people need to believe that you are the best. For this reason, good communication skills are essential for coworkers to develop an accurate picture of your abilities and worth to the organization.

This isn’t to say that someone can be successful by just being a smooth talker. People who lack good technical skills and work ethic will be discovered eventually. What this does mean is that people who are outstanding performers can maximize their chances for success by learning to communicate well with others.

Everyone has the capability to be effective communicators in the workplace if they remember some important points.

· Communication involves more than the content of the statements you make. People who focus primarily on information when they converse will often be viewed as arrogant and uncaring. Conversely, others who tend to focus on social niceties at the expense of useful information may be viewed as boring and irrelevant. Successful IT managers are perceived by others to be competent and good colleagues when they are able to converse in a way that establishes a social connection while passing on useful and accurate information.

· Communication is one of the most important ways a manager can build trust and respect among colleagues. Showing interest and concern in things that are important to coworkers helps to create positive connections that can be very helpful when dealing with work-related issues. For example, team members will generally appreciate a manager who shows interest in them as real people—beyond their ability to complete tasks or solve work-related problems.

· Body language, eye contact, and voice inflection can send signals to people that are often unintended. For example, asking someone how he or she is doing in a monotone voice with poor eye contact will probably not encourage a very positive response or leave a positive impression. Also, looking at the clock or tapping your pencil on the desk during a performance evaluation may give employees the impression that you are not interested in their work or in them. Good eye contact and voice inflection that fits the situation can greatly improve the impression people have of you in the workplace.

· Misunderstandings are one of the most common ways to damage relationships. Assumptions about the words and actions of others are fairly common in most workplaces. Effective IT managers will learn to validate any perceptions they have about what others are thinking or saying before they react. They'll also learn positive and even subtle ways to remind team members and colleagues of important tasks, meetings, and deadlines to avoid confusion or problems.

The following scenario helps to illustrate some of these points. Brenda is a new manager of a LAN and help desk unit for a small organization in the Midwest. She had previously worked for a very large corporation on the East Coast as a LAN technician and help desk coordinator. Brenda quickly jumped into her new position and began to implement a plan for improving the efficiency of her team. She informed her supervisor of her plan, and he gave her approval to proceed. She announced her plans at a team meeting one day and spent some time explaining how each member’s responsibilities would change to accommodate the new plan. As she spoke, she noticed that eye contact from team members was very poor, and she was having difficulty determining that people understood what she was saying. Brenda attempted to generate some discussion about the plan but received no response.

Brenda was a bit puzzled by the reaction of her team, since she believed that the changes would make everyone’s life better within the team. However, she decided to proceed with the plan as scheduled. About one week later, her supervisor called her to his office. He reported that her team members were complaining about her planned changes to the LAN and help desk function to others within the organization. He also said that managers from other units were expressing concern to him that the operation of the LAN may be compromised by the changes. He recommended that she put her plan on hold for a while until things settled down.

Brenda was a bit distraught about the turn of events and sought counsel with a friend who was a psychologist. Her friend listened to her concerns and then asked numerous questions about the characteristics of the organization, her team, and how she had approached people with her plan. After Brenda finished responding, her friend remarked that she had committed a sin common to many new managers—one-way communication. Brenda’s friend went on to say that she had not taken sufficient time to develop strong communication channels and relationships with team members and others within the organization and was paying the price by having her plan compromised.

Brenda reflected on her friend’s comments and realized that she had actually never gotten any buy-in from her team or others that there was a problem with the LAN or help desk. She had also underestimated how quickly information can travel in a small organization and how connected the people were to each other. Brenda decided to change her approach toward her staff and to her job and focus more on relationship building than changing the LAN.

She announced to her team members at the next meeting that the new plan was on hold for the time being, and then she began gathering information from them about the LAN and the help desk—how it had evolved and what concerns they had about its operation. She also began to visit colleagues from other parts of the organization in order to introduce herself and build relationships. She discovered that people were more receptive to her when she approached them and listened to them about their issues and concerns. She also learned that there was an effort to overhaul the LAN system several years before, and it had failed badly, with considerable downtime and loss of productivity. Brenda then realized why people were so nervous about her efforts to change things.

The moral of this story is that effective managers will learn to be good communicators by building positive relationships with those who can impact their ability to succeed and by showing people that their issues and concerns are important. They will also be sensitive to signals from others that things are not clearly understood and that issues and opinions need to be clarified.

Final thoughts
You don't have to be a super communicator to be a successful IT manager. However, good communication skills are an important key to being effective in the workplace. Sensitivity to the issues and priorities of others, as well as finding a balance between the focus on work content and establishing and maintaining a social connection with people, are critical to successful communication in the workplace. It's also important to minimize misunderstandings that can damage relationships and compromise the work by clarifying issues and confirming information in a nonthreatening manner.

To learn more about effective communication in the workplace, take a look at Be Understood or Be Overlooked: Mastering Communication in the Workplace by Graham Andrewartha (2002) and Effective Communication Skills for Scientific and Technical Professionals by Harry Chambers (2001).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

林行止 林行止專欄

2019年7月18日 林行止   林行止專欄 「帶路」應從英殖民史汲取養料 一、 五月,兩位港人熟知不同界別的美國名人,哥爾夫球員老虎伍德(Tiger Woods)和經濟學家拉發(Arthur Laffer, 1940-),分別於上旬及下旬獲特朗普總統頒授「總統自由勳章」(Presidential Medal of Freedom),這是不分種族、國籍的老百姓能獲取的美國最高榮譽。伍德之獲獎,傳媒上似未見負面評論,拉發的卻引起經濟學界紛紛異議。 「資深」讀者對拉發大名,應當不感陌生,對「拉發曲線(Laffer Curve)則肯定記憶猶新!「數十年前」,筆者在這裏多次介紹此曲線的良窳。簡而言之,拉發總結先賢(有人追蹤至十五世紀阿拉伯的理論)的智慧,指出稅率升達某一高位,稅收不增反減,因為當納稅人覺得稅率太高時,不但會高薪請「豪富寄生蟲」的會計師和稅務律師,設計避稅甚且逃稅的策略,還會「怠工」少賺以免墜入高端稅網……。拉發所以得享大名,除人際關係極佳之外(他歷任民主共和兩黨要角及在兩黨當政的白宮擔任經濟顧問,八十年代且曾被英相戴卓爾夫人羅致,為英國的財政政策出謀獻策),其稅率高稅收少的主張,在入息稅稅率高達百分之九十的高稅年代,的確令以調低稅率為政策目標的政客十分「興奮」,遂屢被重用;加上他善解人心,令他得享大名。 拉發受知於特朗普,主要是他為特朗普競選時經濟顧問團隊的成員,特朗普當選後,他閉門寫作,與一名《華日》前編輯合撰一書《特朗普經濟學──復興美國經濟計劃內情》(Trumponomics: Inside the America First Plan to Revive Our Economy),此書雖劣評如潮(筆者未曾寓目),但「簡在帝心」,也許正是他獲殊榮的底因。 攤開稿紙(筆者仍然「筆耕」!)不是因為拉發得獎而寫他的經濟學,而是因為拉發而想起溫年斯基(Jude Wanniski;七十年代《華日》副總編輯),筆者曾在此評介他的成名作《世界這樣運作》(The Way the World Works;拉發首次公開介紹此曲線時,在座者為後成副總統的切尼、國防部長拉非爾和這位傳媒人),其中說及英國殖民史,當中有段描述,與如今中國開拓「一帶一路」頗有相通處。找出舊文一讀,覺得頗有「現實意義」,不妨「舊文新刊」。順便一提,筆者有一經常...

Google面試問呢啲

以福利、人工、前途計算,Google屢被《Fortune》、《福布斯》等雜誌選為最佳公司。最佳公司當然想聘請最佳員工,所以能贏得一個Google的面試機會已非等閒之輩,西雅圖工作顧問Lewis Lin不斷收集這間被譽為全球最難加入的公司的面試問題,除工作範疇上的技術性問題和Google最出名的brain teasers(腦筋遊戲)之外,下列問題全沒所謂最好答案,反而可反映到應徵者性格、處事態度、期望和視野,面試好似X-Ray一樣,把你的底藴都照射出來。 1.到目前為止做個甚麼最令自己引以為傲的事? 2.曾經經歷最大的挫折是甚麼?從中你學到甚麼? 3.在工作中你遇過甚麼你認為是最有趣的問題?最後你是怎樣解決的? 4.有沒有遇過你不認同上司的決定?請詳細講解那次經驗,後來事情的結果又是怎樣?你今日又會如何評價這件事? 5.給我一個請你的理由? 6.你看似一個很正面的人,發生甚麼事情才會看到你低落的一面? 7.如果只給你兩隻蛋,要你測試出雞蛋從高空擲下而不會跌破的最高樓層,你會怎樣做? 8.如果我們請你,現時你的工作令你最懷念的將會是甚麼?

卸膊;兩個動詞? - 古德明

卸膊;兩個動詞? - 古德明 問:「卸膊」英文怎麼說? 答:香港人所謂「卸膊」,是指「規避責任」,英文叫做shirk;有時,「卸膊」帶「推卸責任」的意思,那可以譯做to shift one's responsibility onto other people,例如:(1)He did not shirk his duty in the matter(這件事情,他盡了責)。(2)When anything goes wrong, you can be sure that Mr Tsang will shift his responsibility onto a subordinate(一有什麼出錯,曾先生一定會把責任推卸給下屬)。 又英文俚語有skive一字,指規避工作,例如有工作就缺席、早退等,和「卸膊」差不多,例如:He often skives work(他見到工作,往往就避之則吉)。這樣的卸膊者,叫做shirker或skiver。 問:Philip became acquainted with Kathy(菲力浦認識了凱西)這一句,兩個動詞為什麼連用,而且都用過去式? 答:Become / get(成為)和be(即is、were等,解作「是」)、appear / seem / look / sound(似乎是、看來或聽來似乎是)、remain / stay(仍然是)、prove(結果證明是)等動詞,叫做link verb(連繫動詞),其後都可用形容詞或作用等於形容詞的分詞(participle,即ing或ed形式動詞),例如:(1)He appears / appeared interested in the suggestion(他似乎對這建議感到興趣)。(2)He gets / got tired very easily(他很容易感到疲倦)。讀者示下那一句的became acquainted,就是用這構詞法。